It is with heavy heart we here at Red Robin Chronicles must bid you farewell; due to our hectic schedules and real life commitments we will no longer be able to put forth the consistent, solid effort that blogging demands.
Thanks to all who joined us in railing against political correctness, racial hypocrisy and all things anti-White. I’ve included a few links to places that may satiate your need for current events and commentary as it pertains to our folk:
Red Robin Chronicles will be up until the end of the month, so feel free to peruse our posts. On behalf of Otter and Spike, thanks again and keep fighting the good fight.
Franz Boas – Liberal Icon, Scientific Fraud
By Sam Francis
Two of the major superstitions of our time are the notion that man is merely a blank slate whose behavior is merely the product of the social environment and its sister, that race doesn’t exist. Yet one by one, the pseudo-scientific sources of these myths are being discredited by serious scientists, and last week, one of the biggest sources of all took a nose dive.
Franz Boas, often called the grandfather of modern anthropology and a pioneer pusher of the idea that race is not a very meaningful concept, merely a “social construct” not found in nature, probably ranks with Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud as one of the most influential thinkers of the modern age. As a Columbia professor from 1899 to 1942, he virtually created modern anthropology, and the students he trained—among them, Margaret Mead and some of the most famous names in the field—dominated the discipline until only a few years ago.
One of Boas’ favorite targets was so-called “scientific racism,” and much of his own writing was intended to combat what he saw—sometimes rightly—as unscientific or simply false thinking about race.
But it now turns out that Boas himself was guilty of no small degree of unscientific blunder—and maybe even fraud.
In 1912, Boas published what became a classic study that claimed to show that the skull shapes (“cranial forms”) of the descendants of European immigrants to the United States altered from those of the original immigrants. Boas offered no explanation for why the changes took place, but if they were real, his finding pretty much wiped out the idea that different racial and ethnic types differ in fixed physical characteristics.
“did much to establish the notion in human genetics that what are transmitted in the germ plasm are not fixed characters but potentialities … dependent upon the environment for the particular form they will assume. The ‘nature-nurture’ controversy was largely obviated by this alternative.”
In political terms, if human beings have few or no “fixed characters” and are shaped by the social environment, then what we know as modern liberalism is in business. So is communism, which also assumes that human beings can be transformed by manipulating the social environment.
It’s no accident that Boas was a lifelong sympathizer of Marxism.
Unfortunately, for the social and human engineers,………… Read more…
First in last out gets new meaning for U.S. More-reams as “Chesty” Puller gets replaced by PC friendly fag brother, “Pud.”
Keep ’em coming, says Red Robin, as poofy paratroopers and 300 pound she-boon “spay-shal” ops much preferable to revolt against and eliminate in crumbling McAmerica police-state than brain-washed White men, who are finding out more and more that this limp-wristed government ain’t on their side….
CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. – Marine instructor Maj. Daryl Desimone stood before an auditorium filled with fatigue-clad troops, carrying an unequivocal message: It’s OK to disagree with letting gays serve openly in the military. It’s not OK to disobey orders.
He explained that the impending repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” is an order, one heard by generals and rank-and-file alike as the military tries to change the culture of a traditionally conservative institution.
Only a few of the roughly 150 Marines stepped up to ask questions.
One stood up from a back row and demanded to know why his religious beliefs were being “put aside” in favor of gays, forcing him to “basically grit my teeth and bear it.”
“It’s not really open to discussion,” Desimone said. “Nobody’s trying to change your mind.”
Sexual orientation will now be a private matter, just like religion or politics, he said.
Sgt. Jay Milinichik, of Tulsa, Okla., stood up to ask what would happen if a Marine refused gay roommates.
Marines won’t have separate barracks or showers based on sexual orientation, Desimone said. He added that signing up for the Marines comes with an expectation of less privacy.
That said, officers may decide to separate roommates to preserve peace, just like they do now when roommates argue.
Marines will not be allowed an early discharge for opposing the policy but exceptions will be considered, Desimone said.
“You can’t just walk up and say, ‘I don’t like this. I’m outa here,'” he said.
Classes like Thursday’s for the Combat Logistics Regiment 17 of the 1st Marine Logistics Group are being held at military bases around the world. The Marines expect to finish training by June 1, with all military branches done by summer’s end.
The repeal of the 17-year “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy would go into effect 60 days after the president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that lifting the ban won’t hurt the military’s ability to fight.
Gen. James Amos, the Marine Corps commandant, testified last year that permitting gays to openly serve could disrupt smaller combat units and distract leaders from preparing for battle.
When he appeared this month before the House Armed Services Committee, he said he had been looking for problems that might arise under the new policy and hadn’t found any “recalcitrant pushback.”
“There has not been the anxiety over it from the forces in the field,” he said.
In small group discussions, Marines are being asked to consider their reactions to a wide range of scenarios, from seeing a member “hanging around” a gay bar to hearing locker-room jokes from others who refuse to shower in front of gays.
There is nothing wrong with “hanging around” a gay bar, the training materials state.
The officer who witnesses the loud locker-room banter aimed at gays and lesbians should remind the Marines any discrimination or harassment is inappropriate.
If a Marine spots two men in his battalion kissing off-duty at a shopping mall, he should react as if he were seeing a man and woman, according to the training materials.
If he turns on the television news to see a fellow Marine dressed as a civilian and marching in a parade with a banner that reads, “Support Gays and Lesbians in the Military!” he should accept it as a free right of expression.
A top-notch Marine recruiter opposed to the new policy cannot refuse a promising applicant because of sexual orientation. The recruiter might be considered for another assignment or, at the Navy secretary’s discretion, might be granted early discharge.
Chaplains who preach at base chapels that homosexuality is a sin are entitled to express their beliefs during worship.
At Thursday’s class at Camp Pendleton, there were several questions about benefits.
Desimone said Marines must follow federal law that only recognizes marriage between a man and woman, disqualifying gays from housing allowances and other benefits afforded to married couples.
But he pondered a scenario in which a gay couple would be allowed to live in military base housing because they have children and the partner is a custodial parent.
“There are inconsistencies,” he said. “Anyone who looks at it logically will see there are some things that need to be worked out.”
After class, Petty Officer William Evans of Riverside, Calif., said he was a bit “blindsided” when the repeal was announced. The hospital corpsman lives off the base, but said he would feel uncomfortable sharing barracks with a gay man.
“Of course, it’s not something that everyone’s going to be comfortable with, but we’ll have to deal with it,” he said.
Cpl. Vannessa Huff of Spring Valley, N.Y., said she was confident of a “smooth transition.” Sexual orientation of other Marines is irrelevant in combat, she said.
“It would matter that I would save their lives, and they would save mine,” Huff said. “We all wear the same uniform.”
Happy first Birthday to the Red Robin Chronicles, a site dedicated to tearing down the idols of looney libtards and auditing the cooked books on Black violence and crime statistics. A site that stands unwavering to the commitment of unmasking the anti-White genocidal policies of world Jewry and mocking the craven complicity of Republican falter-boys and Clownservative catamites.
Yes, such a site will inevitably hurt the frail feelings of Faux-news fags….
But fear not, Zionist rapture-bunnies, and pickle-snooted parasites; Red Robin “feels your pain” and is here to help!
By providing you with our blog standard wailing wall.
Just an example of how the jewed up system works to skew and massage certain un-PC friendly criminal statistics.
Check out this mud monkey and then glance over to the right for its vitals. Note where it denotes “race” it reads “White.”
Now, unless you’re blind as Stevie Wonder, I doubt there would be much disagreement that this salsa-sloth sure ain’t White by any stretch of the imagination. Even if that imagination comes from the demented, egalitarian fantasy grey matter of a lib-tard.
This is just one example from the link. They’re are more of these outrageous examples of racial lies and deceit. By playing this numbers racket, Big Jew and his paid-off PC pixies can alter the statistics to make it seem as if Whites are committing more violent crime than is actually the case.
This is the advantage of wielding power. It transcends morality and fairness; two things yidlings never play by. That’s why they win. that’s why we lose. While we try to couch our words in safe, passive terminology, while we back-peddle defensively trying to parry the “racist!” cudgel, Big Jew lies, cheats, steals, defames…and even kills, if need be.
Tribe up, ‘Pudlickins and Libertoonies. If you have any courage in you at all. This isn’t a candle light vigil. Even your “brethren” below is aware of it.
Latest PC sting operation by Thought Commissars looks to pull Katyn Forest type massacre on history. Orwellian weeding of lexicon now in full swing. White epithets such as “redneck”, “White trash” and “cracker” still given credence as legit terminology by Semitic censors.
But fear not, Red Robin readers. Here-where Aryans fear not to tread-NIGGER will continue to be scribed, when referring to the lobe-less apemen that (unfortunately) roam our lands.
What is a word worth? According to Publishers Weekly, NewSouth Books’ upcoming edition of Mark Twain’s seminal novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn will remove all instances of the “n” word—I’ll give you a hint, it’s not nonesuch—present in the text and replace it with slave. The new book will also remove usage of the word Injun. The effort is spearheaded by Twain expert Alan Gribben, who says his PC-ified version is not an attempt to neuter the classic but rather to update it. “Race matters in these books,” Gribben told PW. “It’s a matter of how you express that in the 21st century.”
Unsurprisingly, there are already those who are yelling “Censorship!” as well as others with thesauruses yelling “Bowdlerization!” and “Comstockery!” Their position is understandable: Twain’s book has been one of the most often misunderstood novels of all time, continuously being accused of perpetuating the prejudiced attitudes it is criticizing, and it’s a little disheartening to see a cave-in to those who would ban a book simply because it requires context. On the other hand, if this puts the book into the hands of kids who would not otherwise be allowed to read it due to forces beyond their control (overprotective parents and the school boards they frighten), then maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to judge. It’s unfortunate, but is it really any more catastrophic than a TBS-friendly re-edit of The Godfather, you down-and-dirty melon farmer? The original product is changed for the benefit of those who, for one reason or another, are not mature enough to handle it, but as long as it doesn’t affect the original, is there a problem?
What do you think, Shelf-Lifers? Unnecessary censorship or necessary evil?