Found myself in the bucolic village of Honeoye Falls this afternoon and decided to cruise in to the local grocery store in order to pick up something for dinner, later. I’m coming back from an appointment, it’s about 2pm.
Step out of the car and proceed walking towards the establishment. Notice young nigger swaggering out of the store with what looks to be a quart bottle of beer. It’s a gangly specimen, droopy drawered and vacant eyed. The type you can picture having its rib cage torn from its AIDS emaciated carcass like a stubborn tree stump, by an opportunistic carnivore in ‘Freaka– had it not had the life prolonging advantage of ending up in the McAmerican welfare state.
Inside the market: Another schwoogie; looks to be the typical Black afflete type with tank-top and requisite rodeo clown britches. This sambo is a dark one. Skin as black as freshly laid tarmac. It’s busy jawing with a plump, cherub cheeked White girl at the counter. Possibly attempting to chat her up.( He was still babbling to her when I left.)
At the checkout–Another Zulu, this time a female; dressed in that afro-centric Kwanza garb you’d expect to see spavined, goat-faced Maya Angelou, or some other ebonics expectorating, White elite anointed potentate, wrapped in.
Now, the perplexing thing is, Honeoye Falls is a rural hamlet, with around 2500 residents and a near 99 percent White population. It’s also enchased in the middle of Mendon, and sports a very high tax rate, along with many high-end homes. No, this isn’t a low-income ghetto. Yet every time I happen to be in this particular town I can’t help but be struck by the conspicuously large amount of Blacks I see. So much for the “evil White racist” accusation lib-girls like to sputter. It becomes quite apparent that to the contrary, Whites are TOO accepting.TOO deracinated. And perhaps, too pretentious, as some of these Blacks, no doubt, are brought in by incompetence-on-a-stick- worshipers, in a never-ending death wish to prove their moral superiority over their fellow-man. Sure, they could help poor White kids in this area, but nothing gets the egalitarian attention and Marxist media adoration like introducing your White community-and White daughters- to a tribe of head hunters and inner city bling-kongs.
Pulling out of the parking lot; there’s a small compact car in front of me, looks to have a diminutive elderly male driver, White. I spot the large, Obama ’08 bumper sticker plastered on the pocket-size trunk of his automobile. I begin to wonder when this town will reach that non-White tipping point, much like I’ve seen happen to suburbs in closer proximity to the city of Rot-chester. They were once nice White areas, too. Now, they’re filled with murder and mayhem, with former White residents bemoaning to me how they had to pack up and leave, get away from “that element.”
And guess where these Whites go? Yep, you guessed it. To quiet, White places. Like Honeoye Falls. To join churches. Decorate their eco-friendly hybrids with Obama stickers. Educate their children on the evils of “racism” and the perpetual guilt and shame Whites must collectively carry, like a millstone around their conscience, for all the wickedness they continue to perpetrate on the innocent , non-White Peoples of Planet Earth.
Then, the murder and mayhem begins…
Ching-Changs branch out in new direction as ‘Pudlickins , Dumbocrats and “pig bidness” find that when it comes to outsourcing and arching profit margins, they just cantilever!
Meanwhile McAmericans are sent up shit creek without a paddle-or bridge- as sinking country reaches end of the economic gangplank…
New San Francisco bridge built in China to be shipped to US
First, China made cut-price clothes and knick-knacks. Then it learned how to make mobile phones and iPads. Now it is making a 2,050ft-long bridge spanning the San Francisco bay.
By Malcolm Moore, Shanghai
11:32AM BST 28 Jun 2011
Next month, four enormous steel skeletons, the last of the 12 segments of the bridge, will be shipped 6,500 miles from Shanghai to San Francisco before being assembled on site.
The bridge, which will connect San Francisco to Oakland on the other side of the bay, is a sign of how China has moved on from building roads and ports in Africa and the developing world and is now aggressively bidding for, and winning, major construction and engineering projects in the United States and Europe.
After building forests of skyscrapers in Beijing and Shanghai, showpiece buildings like the Bird’s Nest stadium and the Guangzhou Opera House, and a high-speed rail network that is the envy of the world, Chinese construction companies are flush with cash and confidence. This week, Wen Jiabao, the Chinese premier, lobbied David Cameron to give the contract for the UK’s new high speed rail link to a Chinese company.
According to Engineering News Record, five of the world’s top 10 contractors, in terms of revenue, are now Chinese, with likes of China State Construction Engineering Group (CSCEC) overtaking established American giants like Bechtel.
CSCEC has already built seven schools in the US, apartment blocks in Washington DC and New York and is in the middle of building a 4,000-room casino in Atlantic City. In New York, it has won contracts to renovate the subway system, build a new metro platform near Yankee stadium, and refurbish the Alexander Hamilton Bridge over the Harlem river.
In Europe, meanwhile, China has signed deals with Serbia for a bridge over the river Danube and a connecting road to Belgrade. A £215 million deal will see Chinese firms refurbishing and upgrading a Serbian coal-fired power plant, while China is building a new mobile phone network in Hungary and wants to sell Bulgaria a nuclear power plant, built from a French design.
“The European construction market is huge and the Chinese are very interested in it,” said Werner Buelen at the European Federation of Building and Woodworkers, an umbrella organisation for Europe’s construction trade unions. “At the moment, they seem to be running a pilot programme to decide whether to access the market directly by bidding on contracts or whether to buy European construction companies and then use those to access the market,” he added.
“They have a very clever mechanism, with several advantages. The first is financing, which they have better access to because Chinese companies are mostly state-owned. It is getting more and more difficult for European contractors to access financing, and you need to have a lot of finance in the construction industry,” he said.
“Then they have managed to transfer Chinese workers, who are cheaper.
They can also use construction machinery they have built in China.
Finally, because they can generate still profit despite their low bids, they use that money to hire famous architects and demonstrate they can deliver a project above the normal standard”.
However, earlier this month, China was fired from its first major prestige project in Europe, the new A2 motorway in Poland for the Euro 2012 football championships. After bidding 44 per cent lower than the Polish government had budgeted for the road, a Chinese state-owned building company found it was unable to pay its workers to finish the job.
“It is difficult for Chinese companies,” said Wang Shouqing, a professor at the International Engineering research department at the elite Tsinghua university. “They are not familiar with Western culture, law or standards. What happened in Poland was a very bad example for other Chinese companies. It could take another decade or even 20 years to put our footprint on Europe and the US.” The embarrassment in Poland led China’s State Council to publish a notice on Monday warning the heads of China’s state-owned companies that they would be “punished” if their companies negligently lost money on overseas projects.
Norman Haste OBE, an engineer whose projects include the second Severn crossing and the design of Heathrow’s Terminal 5, said he had encountered Chinese firms bidding aggressively in the Middle East and that he had a “high regard for what they have done in recent years”.
He said: “Their capabilities are second to none, and they are able to finance projects. There is a big demand for new investment in Eastern Europe and similarly in the United States and they will do well there.” But he added that the history of protectionism in the French, German and UK markets might be harder to break.
Franz Boas – Liberal Icon, Scientific Fraud
By Sam Francis
Two of the major superstitions of our time are the notion that man is merely a blank slate whose behavior is merely the product of the social environment and its sister, that race doesn’t exist. Yet one by one, the pseudo-scientific sources of these myths are being discredited by serious scientists, and last week, one of the biggest sources of all took a nose dive.
Franz Boas, often called the grandfather of modern anthropology and a pioneer pusher of the idea that race is not a very meaningful concept, merely a “social construct” not found in nature, probably ranks with Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud as one of the most influential thinkers of the modern age. As a Columbia professor from 1899 to 1942, he virtually created modern anthropology, and the students he trained—among them, Margaret Mead and some of the most famous names in the field—dominated the discipline until only a few years ago.
One of Boas’ favorite targets was so-called “scientific racism,” and much of his own writing was intended to combat what he saw—sometimes rightly—as unscientific or simply false thinking about race.
But it now turns out that Boas himself was guilty of no small degree of unscientific blunder—and maybe even fraud.
In 1912, Boas published what became a classic study that claimed to show that the skull shapes (“cranial forms”) of the descendants of European immigrants to the United States altered from those of the original immigrants. Boas offered no explanation for why the changes took place, but if they were real, his finding pretty much wiped out the idea that different racial and ethnic types differ in fixed physical characteristics.
“did much to establish the notion in human genetics that what are transmitted in the germ plasm are not fixed characters but potentialities … dependent upon the environment for the particular form they will assume. The ‘nature-nurture’ controversy was largely obviated by this alternative.”
In political terms, if human beings have few or no “fixed characters” and are shaped by the social environment, then what we know as modern liberalism is in business. So is communism, which also assumes that human beings can be transformed by manipulating the social environment.
It’s no accident that Boas was a lifelong sympathizer of Marxism.
Unfortunately, for the social and human engineers,………… Read more…
Some friends and readers have asked me why I have been silent on the New York State gay marriage debate. I have been silent because I am torn a little on this. Laws of nature, religious rights, libertarian views, etc…..
There is so much deep conflict with this issue that got us where we are. Like little capillaries that that deliver our life’s blood. But we have ignored the capillaries and only focus on the artery.
I will start with my thoughts from furthest back and possibly deepest to the most recent and probably least significant.
Going way back, I believe marriage is a social construct that we were sold on thousands of years ago. I am not convinced that marriage is in tune with the laws of nature, and I view the laws of nature as the end all be all. Maybe we were meant to breed multiple mates or naturally we would stay together as a family unit. Birth control ties in there as well. I don’t think birth control or marriage was intended for man to use. Are these bad things, no not really but it is leading us to gay marriage.
Then, the government ties social benefits to marriage. That was a big mistake. Nowhere that I know of in the constitution do we talk about social benefits, tax breaks, etc for married people. I find this to be a major sticking point for gays. They want to reap the social and monetary benefits of hetro married couples and this is due to the gov getting in our bedrooms and getting too deep in our lives which has excluded gay couples by design. This is one of the reasons I am for removing all tax loop holes including tax credits for children as well as lowering or eliminating income tax. Take away the benefits for married couples and gays will not be trying so hard to horn in on marriage like a well hung stud going the wrong way on the dirty jersey turnpike if you know what I mean.
Next, homosexuality is not moral or normal or how our species is intended to exist, thrive, and survive. There is nothing natural about homosexuality. It goes against everything our bodies and existents were designed for. So I have a hard time saying “yeah gay marriage is fine”, when I don’t believe homosexuality is appropriate. To get me to agree and accept gay marriage I would first have to agree with homo life choices.
Then I have the religious conflict on my mind. To me marriage is a religious sanction no matter what that religion is. So if your religion is against homosexuality then of course homo’s should not be given religious ceremonies. Do not try to force religious people to accept same sex marriage. That is what Justice of the peace is for, for non-religious unions.
The slippery slope issue…………….. Read more…
As the withered, tuneless troubadour known as the Republican Party rolls out their playmate politicians Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann, in a desperate attempt to become Bunny-In-Chief and bump their libgirl twin sister from the centerfold spread, I began wondering just who would be the best competitive choice for these lefty-lite losers.
After all, they’ve tried like Trotsky to out-liberal the liberals with their support of open borders, amnesty, Draconian laws, commitment to anti-White hiring practices, etc. They’ve even spent their last few years dry humping the Tea Party movement in a last ditch effort to avoid flat-lining across McAmerica. So what candidates would be a serious threat to the Mulatto Messiah and his posse of pickle-snooted puppeteers?
Here’s my “Top of the GOPs”:
1. Bachmann/Palin–Sex sells and it would sure sell better to the masses of asses to see these two bimbos campaigning in short tight mini-skirts and copious amounts of cleavage. A bikini clad Jello-wrestling contest to decide the ‘Pudlickin representative for 2012 would draw millions of viewers, most of whom care about real issues about as much as Shannon Sharpe cares about pronunciation.
2. Richard Ramirez–Sure, he’s doing life for rape and murder, but what better face to put out front for the “Hispanic” vote! The ‘Pudlickins have been groveling at the Latrino’s filthy refried feet for years; now’s the chance to show their bleeting commitment to anti-Whiteness and DIE-versity! Hail Satan and viva La Raza!
3. Barack Obama–I know he’s a Dumbocrat, but is there really any difference between these two phoney, Jewified political fronts? It sure would make rigging, er, I mean, computing the voter tallies a breeze for all those intellectually challenged affirmative action apes the gubmint loves hiring.
4. Mike Tyson–He’s completely broke and owes the IRS a fortune after pissing away 400 million in typical Negro fashion. Why not reach out to the former heavyweight champ? Can you just picture the look on Obama’s puss at the presidential debates when Iron Mike tells Barack he’s going to make him his girlfriend?
5. That Hebe housemaid on that TV sitcom ‘Different Strokes.’ I have no idea why I’ve included her, but I’m willing to bet she’d be less of a philo-Semitic pole smoker than Romney or Huckabee.
Dare to dream, my ‘Pudlickin porkies, as you hemorrhage against the dying of the White.
Classic piece by Dr. William Pierce concerning the verboten subject of race.
What is Racism?
Dr. William Pierce
Today let’s talk about racism and related matters. There’s hardly a subject the average White person is more uptight about, hardly a subject that makes him more uncomfortable. Fifty or 60 years ago people were really uptight about sex. Very few people could talk about it honestly and openly and comfortably. It embarrassed them. Whenever the subject came up people used all sorts of euphemisms and evasions to avoid having to mention things or use words that made them squirm and blush, things that they just couldn’t deal with straightforwardly. In polite conversation one could not even use the word leg in talking about a woman, for example. It was too risque, bordering on the pornographic, because of the mental associations it evoked.
Why was that? Why did talking about sex make us uncomfortable? Well, of course, it was because sex was a taboo subject. There were a lot of social and religious prohibitions and restrictions associated with sex, and these prohibitions conflicted with our natural urges. We were taught that following these natural urges was sinful, and that terrible things would happen to us if we did. The result was that we felt guilty about our natural urges. To avoid the very unpleasant feeling of guilt, we tried to avoid the subject of sex. We swept it under the rug and tried not to think about it.
That’s the way it is with the subject of race today. Just as we were conditioned by religious teachings 50 or 60 years ago to feel guilty about our natural sexual inclinations, today we are conditioned — primarily by the controlled mass media — to feel guilty about our natural racial inclinations. We are conditioned to believe that they are sinful.